1. home
  2. AQAR 2020-21


Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.1.1. Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)

View Document

2.1.2. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years ( exclusive of supernumerary seats)

View Document

Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.2.1. The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners

View Document

2.2.2. Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)

View Document

Key Indicator 2.3: Teaching- Learning Process

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.3.1. Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences

View Document

2.3.2 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process.

View Document

2.3.3. Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )

mentor/mentee ratio

Circulars pertaining to assigning mentors to mentees

Upload, number of students enrolled and full time teachers on roll

Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.4.1. Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years

View Document

2.4.2. Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)

View Document

2.4.3. Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years)

View Document

Key Indicator 2.5: Evaluation Process and Reforms

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.5.1. Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode

View Document

2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient

View Document

Key Indicator 2.6: Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.6.1. Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students.

View Document

2.6.2. Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.

View Document

2.6.3 Average pass percentage of Students during last five years

View Document

Key Indicator 2.7: Student Satisfaction Survey

Metrics

Supporting Documents

2.7.1. Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.

View Document